One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Milosia2
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 2088 next>>
May 10, 2024 19:06:52   #
Ri-chard wrote:
SNAP payments will now be included in the definition of public assistance households when calculating SSI.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) announced that it is updating its definition of a “public assistance household” to ensure that financially vulnerable Americans have greater access to Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

Now what v**er base would that be. Or what coming for all of us.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/new-rule-aims-to-expand-peoples-access-to-supplemental-security-income-5647624?utm_source=News&src_src=News&utm_campaign=breaking-2024-05-10-2&src_cmp=breaking-2024-05-10-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAc%2FEofRIZxJDo%2BrYct39WBfp0zlf34%2FYXsNLCEoS%2FFE%2BELMR5
SNAP payments will now be included in the definiti... (show quote)


All part of the plan yo destroy it .
Go to
May 10, 2024 19:01:43   #
permafrost wrote:
hello to all the OPPers this fine wet day

Has President Biden helped the economy or lowered inflation?

Hmmm. Let’s see. Before the p******c, the previous guy had k**led about 2,000 American factories and cost us 300,000 jobs because of his trade war. In 2018 we saw the worst year for the Dow since the 2008 housing crisis, ending the longest bull market in American history. By 2019 the Fed was lowering interest rates to try to prevent a recession.

Then a p******c happened, the former guy said it wasn’t a real threat, then blamed it for his failed economy. We saw record job losses, the six worst point drops in the history of the Dow, and a record deficit. The one thing the former guy did to actually impact anything was to force OPEC into a deal to raise oil prices until mid-2022. Because obviously the best thing to do during a global financial crisis is increase global fuel prices. Well, if you’re an i***t that is.

So what did Biden do? Well, in 2021 the p******c got worse, but thanks to Biden’s stimulus bill and policies, 85% of businesses and 95% of schools that closed in 2020 reopened by the end of 2021. We saw a record number of jobs added to the economy in a single year, a record number of new businesses startups, a record cut to the deficit in a President’s first year, and the Dow set a record for most record highs in one year.

We saw the fastest economic recovery in history. Inflation in the US remained consistently lower than that in other industrialized nations, unemployment reached a historic low, childhood poverty hit a record low, workforce participation increased for the first time since Clinton was president, saw home values rise, saw wages rise, saw the best GDP growth in four decades, we made a historic investment in infrastructure without adding a dollar to the deficit, brought microchip manufacturing to the US, and made it legal for Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices for the first time in history.

Now we’ve added a record number of jobs to the economy for a single P**********l term, we’ve had the largest surge in wealth to the middle class in decades, and domestic oil production is at a record high. And all we did differently was change
hello to all the OPPers this fine wet day br br H... (show quote)


Excellent !
Added fact :
Since 2017 our billionaires have
Doubled their Wealth !!!!
Go to
May 9, 2024 20:07:15   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
Our allies will never trust us again under this lying POS president! https://steadfastandloyal.com/us-politics/biden-halts-israel-arms-shipment/


Ally. ????
More like
Dependent !!!!
Go to
May 9, 2024 20:05:57   #
Ri-chard wrote:
Pages now in different order than when confiscated in FBI raid.

The case already is in trouble, what with prosecutors' admission that they tainted evidence by changing the location of some of the documents they took.

But now there's a new headache for special counsel Jack Smith, a report from the Federalist that suggests "federal employees planted classified documents to frame Trump."

https://www.wnd.com/2024/05/report-feds-may-planted-evidence-trump/?utm_source=wnd-news-alerts.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=breaking-news-alert-5-9-2024-2
Pages now in different order than when confiscated... (show quote)


Of course they did. !!!
Federalists are always right about everything .
Excerpt everything else.
Go to
May 9, 2024 19:59:46   #
liberalh****r wrote:
What crime?

Your endless false accusations are falling apart in court...... America and the world is watching your scumbaggery....... you're about to be 0-91.

You should feel lucky blatant lying isn't a crime, you'd get a taste if prison yourself........ life.


What crime. ???
What crime was Cohen convicted of and sent to prison ???
For trumps Crimes. !!!
Cohen didn’t get sex with stormy Daniels either. !
But same crime otherwise.
Go to
May 9, 2024 19:54:42   #
ACP45 wrote:
https://rumble.com/v4tyu4z-did-the-babylon-bee-hit-the-mark-with-this-parody-of-woke-jesus-or-did-they.html


Billionaires have doubled their wealth since
2017 !!!!’
Woke that !!!!!
Go to
May 9, 2024 19:51:58   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
How is that any different from what is going on now? https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/30/politics/clinton-dnc-steele-dossier-fusion-gps/index.html


Russian Intel funded it .
Go to
May 9, 2024 19:50:13   #
Ri-chard wrote:
New York City Mayor Eric Adams has declared that Rikers Island is equipped to house former President Donald Trump if necessary.
https://washingtondigest.com/eric-adams-assures-rikers-islands-preparedness-for-trumps-potential-imprisonment/?utm_source=WD&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=WD4&utm_content=WD4B


Why should trump be treated any different than sny other pos criminal. ????
Throw him in GP and forget about him .
The whiney little b***h .
Go to
May 8, 2024 14:09:48   #
Ri-chard wrote:
He also claimed that other judges who oversaw his civil fraud and defamation trials were “corrupt.”

“What these THUGS are doing is AN ATTACK ON THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, AND OUR ONCE GREAT NATION ITSELF,” Trump wrote. “OUR FIRST AMENDMENT MUST STAND, FREE AND STRONG. “GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!'”

https://republic-brief.com/trump-has-epic-response-to-judge-after-being-threatened-with-jail-time/


What an fffing delusional halfwit .
Who is he now , John Paul Jones.
Or was it Patrick Henry ???
Go to
May 8, 2024 14:06:14   #
Ri-chard wrote:
We are rapidly headed for a time when the only capital crime left will be the crime of saying or thinking, that those who are attempting to genocide humanity should all be put to death, or that humanity has a natural right of self-defense to do so, without regard of any human law.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/blackrock-ceo-tells-wef-that-countries-with-declining-population-will-be-big-winners-thanks-to-ai/



Blackrock !!!!
Go to
May 8, 2024 14:04:43   #
Strycker wrote:
Since it has been admitted by Smith that some papers were added to Trumps seized boxes and evidence was altered for a photo op by the FBI the whole case should be shut down. There is no longer any confidence in the evidence. There is no way of knowing what other evidence might have been tampered with.


Yeah , right !!!!
Possession is 9/10s of the Law.
Donald’s possession guilts him to the max .
He should never have had any of these documents.
Go to
May 8, 2024 13:58:57   #
Ri-chard wrote:
He's thrown $80 billion at the IRS to build an army of 87,000 new auditors… and shake down millions of Americans struggling to save up for retirement.

This is not the first time “Fair Share” Biden has targeted retirees.

In 1983, he v**ed to slap a 50% tax on Social Security…

Then he v**ed to increase it to 85% in 1994…

And now he’s determined to ram through Congress a $4.7 TRILLION tax hike…

That includes punishing taxes on retirement investments and even Medicare.

As you can see, “Middle Class” Joe has been waging a silent war on retirees for decades…

But in a move that went largely unnoticed…

President Trump deliberately left open an IRS Loophole that could shield your nest egg from Biden’s relentless attack on hard-working Americans.

Few people reported on it…

But thanks to this genius IRS Loophole, you can take your IRA, 401(k), Pension, and cash out of stocks, bonds and bank accounts…

And shield them from the grabby hands of Biden’s agents.
He's thrown $80 billion at the IRS to build an arm... (show quote)


$400,000 and less is unaffected .
The problem is the millionaires and billionaires only paying 3% in taxes.
Go to
May 8, 2024 13:55:04   #
Proud American Patriot wrote:
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4646851-texas-greg-abbott-national-guard-space-force/


What upcoming C**p. ??
Is your daddy the Loser planning another failed takeover attempt ?????
To accomplish what ???
Scorched earth. ???
Go to
May 8, 2024 13:48:32   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Why Can't Stupid Democrats Learn From Their Mistakes?


Can you name one ffing nill your stupid rrpublicdns have written and passed that will benefit you. ?????
One
Only one !!!!!
Complain about the Dems all day , but remember they are the only reason you get to speak and act as you do .
Your N**i Party won’t tolerate you .
Go to
May 8, 2024 11:50:44   #
AuntiE wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/dont-believe-washington-war-machine-putin-not-going-invade-another-nato-ally-opinion-1897533

Don't Believe the Washington War Machine: Putin Is Not Going to Invade Another NATO Ally | Opinion
By: By Rebekah Koffler former DIA

The primary reason for continuing to flow billions of dollars in cash and weaponry to Ukraine for what is clearly becoming another Afghanistan, is that if we don't, Putin will march through Europe, invading a NATO country such as Poland or the Baltics. In this case, the U.S. would have to deploy armed forces to fight off the Russians to defend the Europeans. These are the talking points that the Washington Establishment politicians and their fellow commentariat members in the media have been using to convince the American people to continue parting with their hard-earned money. In fact, even Speaker Mike Johnson, who as a rank-and-file Right-wing Congressman opposed the funding of Ukraine's war effort, recently signed off on another massive foreign aid package, $95 billion worth, the bulk of which is designated for Kyiv.

"I think that Vladimir Putin would continue to march through Europe if he were allowed," said Johnson, justifying the spending of another $61 billion on a what serious analysts assess as a unwinnable war. "I think he might go to the Baltics next. I think he might have a showdown with Poland or one of our NATO allies," asserted Johnson.

But is it true?

Evidence indicates that this justification for depleting U.S. treasury and weapons arsenal represents a lack of understanding of Putin's thinking and Russia's security strategy—and the incompetence of our national security apparatus. At worst, it is a lie fed to the American people for some other reason.

Here's why Putin is highly unlikely to invade a NATO nation:

Many in the West view Putin as a reckless dictator with imperial ambitions. As someone who spent her intelligence career studying and analyzing Putin's thinking and Russia's war-fighting doctrine and security strategy, I'm here to tell that while Putin is a typical Russian dictator, he is entirely rational.

Putin invaded Ukraine to enforce his version of the Monroe Doctrine, to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, and to restore the strategic buffer zone on which Russia relied for its security for centuries. No sane military commander would allow an adversarial alliance to situate itself along more than 1,000 miles of its border.

Putin never made it a secret what his goals were for Ukraine as well as other former Soviet states, such as Belarus, Moldova, and Georgia. In every public speech or official writing, the Russian strongman clearly declared that post-Soviet nations, including Ukraine, were off limits for Western influence; accepting them into NATO would be crossing Russia's red line.

Moreover, every strategic planning document of the Russian Federation, such as its Foreign Policy Concept, National Security Strategy, Military Doctrine and the like, in every iteration since 2000 and in some cases since 1993, codify Moscow's strategic goals of re-integrating the post-Soviet neighbors into a supranational alliance that Moscow calls The Eurasian Union.

By contrast, no plans to "integrate" or take by force a NATO member nation have been declared in any Russia's official doctrinal documents or official speeches made by Putin or the Kremlin.

As a former Defense Intelligence Agency officer and one of top three analysts on Russian Doctrine & Strategy who worked with the CIA's National Clandestine Service, I had access to the most sensitive intelligence—including Top Secret intelligence, with code word sub-compartments and red stripes indicating for President's Eyes Only. There was no intelligence revealing or suggesting that Putin had designs on Europe beyond the post-Soviet states. We've conducted multiple wargames simulating a Russia-US/NATO war and in all of the scenarios, a local conflict between Russia and its post-Soviet neighbor escalated into a war with the U.S. and NATO. No scenario included Russia attacking a NATO country that it did not consider as part of its strategic buffer zone.

In fact, none of the Intelligence Community's annual threat assessments that are published at the unclassified level by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, including the one for 2024, include analysis suggesting that Putin would invade a NATO member.

If such intelligence existed, you can be sure that it would be declassified immediately. Wouldn't the powers that be want the American people to be on board with continuing to fund another forever war? The intelligence agencies, in the past several years, have routinely declassified even highly sensitive intelligence if it serves the purpose of the political class. They also routinely leak intelligence to left-leaning media, such as The Washington Post and the New York Times.

To the contrary, several U.S. intelligence assessments contradict the Washington Establishment's narrative that Putin would invade a NATO member. An invasion of a NATO country would undoubtedly trigger Article 5 Collective Defense, which would require the deployment of NATO forces to defend the invaded NATO member. Claims that Putin would want a war with NATO on his hands is unequivocally disputed by the following statement from the 2024 Annual Threat assessment by the intelligence community, that "Russia almost certainly does not want a direct military conflict with U.S. and NATO forces and will continue asymmetric activity below what it calculates to be the threshold of military conflict globally."

The following excerpts from the 2024 assessment entirely refute the idea that Russia has the military and economic capacity to invade a NATO country, triggering a war with NATO:

"Russia has suffered more military losses than at any time since World War II—roughly 300,000 casualties and thousands of tanks and armored combat vehicles."

"Moscow's military forces will face a multi-year recovery after suffering extensive equipment and personnel losses during the Ukraine conflict."

"The Russian military has and will continue to face issues of attrition, personnel shortages, and morale challenges."

"Russia's GDP is on a trajectory for modest growth in 2024 but its longer-term competitiveness has diminished in comparison to its pre-war outlook."

Finally, U.S. and NATO leaders knew as early as in 2013 and possibly earlier about Putin's plans to restore Russia's strategic security perimeter. As a former senior official in the U.S. intelligence community, I personally briefed President Obama's White House national security staff on Putin's plans and Russia's war-fighting strategy multiple times. I also briefed countless top U.S. military commanders and Pentagon officials, as well as NATO ministers and military leaders, including just months prior to Putin's invasion of Crimea in 2014.

As vice president at the time, the go-to person on Ukraine policy, and the architect of the failed Russia "reset" strategy, Joe Biden had to be made aware of those briefings. If anyone in the U.S. and NATO senior leadership thought that Putin would invade a NATO country, why didn't they beef up there defense spending prior to Russia's attack on Ukraine in 2022? To this day, the majority of NATO nations fail to spend the two percent of GDP guideline on defense.

Putin is clearly a typical Russian dictator and a bad dude. But he is not suicidal. Invading a NATO country is not part of his agenda.

If Washington elites are hell bent on continuing to fund another forever war, impoverishing ordinary Americans, as inflation is raging in our homeland, they should pick a more clever excuse.

Yet so many on this very site relentlessly swear and dev**e Putin will, not only take Ukraine, but plans on invading Europe. Of course, those same people will believe they know more, because DC told them so, than someone with years for experience in the DIA. What a group of dolts!!!
https://www.newsweek.com/dont-believe-washington-w... (show quote)


Be careful you don’t step in it ,
It’s propaganda !!!!!!
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 2088 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.